The Rice Purity Test 2.0: What's New in the Latest Version?
Discover the latest version of the Rice Purity Test, the Rice Purity Test 2.0, with new questions, an improved scoring system, and more inclusive language. Find out how this classic survey has evolved to reflect the changing behaviors and experiences of young people today

Remember that late-night dorm room moment when you first encountered the Rice Purity Test? That slightly awkward, slightly thrilling experience of revealing parts of yourself through 100 seemingly innocent checkboxes? For decades, this digital rite of passage has guided countless students through moments of bonding, self-reflection, and occasionally, gentle ribbing among friends. But like all of us, this beloved cultural touchstone has grown up a bit. Enter Rice Purity Test 2.0—reimagined for a generation whose experiences reflect our evolving digital landscape and changing social norms. Let's explore how this familiar friend has transformed to better understand who we are becoming.
New Questions
As I scrolled through the updated version, I couldn't help but smile at how the questions have evolved to capture our modern experiences. Where once we were only asked about physical encounters and tangible rebellions, now the test gently inquires about our digital footprints—have you ever found yourself caught in the swirling currents of online conflict? Have you exhaled clouds from sleek electronic devices that didn't exist when the original test was penned? Has your heart raced with the quiet thrill of slipping something into your pocket unpaid? These additions feel like an acknowledgment that our lives now unfold across multiple realities—physical and virtual—and that our experiences in both spaces shape who we're becoming. These new questions reflect not just changing behaviors, but the expanding landscape where we navigate our identities and choices.
Improved Scoring
Gone is the simplistic algorithm that treated all experiences as equal markers on your journey. The 2.0 version embraces what we've all intuitively known—that some choices carry different weight in shaping our paths than others. I found myself appreciating how the new scoring recognizes the nuanced reality of human experience. That fleeting crush you had on your lab partner no longer mathematically equates to more consequential choices about substances that alter your consciousness. This weighted approach feels more like a compassionate friend who understands context matters, rather than a rigid judge marking off identical demerits for vastly different life moments. The result is a reflection that feels more authentically you—complex, multidimensional, and impossible to reduce to a single metric.
More Inclusive Language
Perhaps what touched me most deeply was seeing how the language has blossomed into something that embraces all of us, in all our beautiful diversity. The original test, product of its time, unintentionally built walls through its wording—assumptions about who we love, how we identify, what connections matter. The 2.0 version gently dismantles these barriers. Reading through questions that no longer presume my attractions or identity felt like being fully seen for perhaps the first time in this familiar ritual. "Have you had sex with someone?" whispers the new version, making space for all kinds of love and connection. These shifts in language aren't merely political correctness—they're an open-armed invitation saying everyone's journey matters, everyone's experiences count. The test finally reflects the beautiful truth that purity isn't about fitting predefined boxes, but about our authentic relationship with our own choices.
Conclusion
As I reached the end of Rice Purity Test 2.0, I felt a surprising warmth—like reconnecting with an old friend who has grown alongside me. This isn't just an updated survey; it's a mirror reflecting how we've collectively evolved in our understanding of experience, identity, and connection. Whether you take it huddled with new friends during orientation week, or in a quiet moment of personal reflection, this refreshed version offers something deeper than its predecessor. It invites us to see ourselves through a more compassionate, nuanced lens—acknowledging that our "purity" isn't about adherence to rigid standards, but about the authentic, complex tapestry of moments that make us uniquely ourselves. Perhaps that's the most beautiful evolution of all—a shift from judgment toward understanding, from measurement toward meaning.